But peple already have good variable __read_mostly for most used codes.
În sâm., 8 feb. 2025 la 11:18, Debian Bug Tracking System <ow...@bugs.debian.org> a scris: > > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the linux-source package: > > #1095460: linux-source: Reading from config file is not good. > > It has been closed by Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org>. > > Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. > If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a > better one in a separate message then please contact Bastian Blank > <wa...@debian.org> by > replying to this email. > > > -- > 1095460: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095460 > Debian Bug Tracking System > Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Bastian Blank <wa...@debian.org> > To: Marian Corcodel <corcodel.mar...@gmail.com>, 1095460-d...@bugs.debian.org > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 12:13:41 +0100 > Subject: Re: Bug#1095460: linux-source: Reading from config file is not good. > On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 11:03:48AM +0000, Marian Corcodel wrote: > > Just one situation , include/generated/autoconf.h file can bee > > manipulated after build linux kernel? > > You run "make menuconfig" again, change the config and rebuild. > > Bastian > > -- > You can't evaluate a man by logic alone. > -- McCoy, "I, Mudd", stardate 4513.3 > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Corcodel Marian <corcodel.mar...@gmail.com> > To: Debian Bug Tracking System <sub...@bugs.debian.org> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2025 07:32:52 +0000 > Subject: linux-source: Reading from config file is not good. > Package: linux-source > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: corcodel.mar...@gmail.com > > Hi , i describe some situation wich occur on linux kernel: > File kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h > static void rcu_report_exp_cpu_mult(struct rcu_node *rnp, > unsigned long mask, bool wake) > { > int cpu; > unsigned long flags; > struct rcu_data *rdp; > > raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags); > if (!(rnp->expmask & mask)) { > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags); > return; > } > WRITE_ONCE(rnp->expmask, rnp->expmask & ~mask); > for_each_leaf_node_cpu_mask(rnp, cpu, mask) { > rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu); > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) || > !rdp->rcu_forced_tick_exp) > continue; > rdp->rcu_forced_tick_exp = false; > tick_dep_clear_cpu(cpu, TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU_EXP); > } > __rcu_report_exp_rnp(rnp, wake, flags); /* Releases rnp->lock. */ > } > > From function IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) is only for muscle, using this > manner just inject delays on operations. > > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 12.9 > APT prefers stable > APT policy: (500, 'stable') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 6.12.5+ (SMP w/8 CPU threads; PREEMPT) > Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), > LANGUAGE=en_US:en > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash > Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
