On 23.12.24 Hilmar Preusse (hill...@web.de) wrote:
> On 23.12.24 Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@debian.org) wrote:

Hi Lucas,

> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to
> > build on armhf.
> > 
> > This package currently has binary packages on armhf, so this is a
> > regression.  Also, there are no known issues on amd64 or arm64
> > according to recent (a couple days ago) rebuilds.
> > 
> 
> This seems to be caused by #1085120, although the bug is for armel.
> The phenomena are about the same. I mark this bug as blocked by the
> other and wait for gs 10.00.05 .
> 

Currently gs 10.00.05 does not exists and even if it will be released
tomorrow, I have doubt that it will make it into trixie.

Would it be allowed to simply drop the architechtures in question for
trixie and re-include it later?

Hilmar

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to