Source: openldap
Version: 2.6.9+dfsg-1
Tags: patch upstream
Severity: important
Justification: architecture cross bootstrap regression
User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftcbfs
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Hi Ryan,
I fear openldap regressed cross building again. Upstream thought it
would be a good idea to use AC_PATH_PROGS(CC, ...) unfortunately, that
initializes CC to the build architecture compiler and once autoconf
checks for CC, it just settles on the one lacking a tool prefix. Just
swapping out AC_PATH_PROGS for AC_PATH_TOOLS (in multiple instances)
fixes this for good. I'm attaching a patch for your convenience. Can you
funnel it upstream?
Helmut
--- openldap-2.6.9+dfsg.orig/configure.ac
+++ openldap-2.6.9+dfsg/configure.ac
@@ -675,7 +675,7 @@
if test $ol_aix_threads = yes ; then
if test -z "${CC}" ; then
- AC_CHECK_PROGS(CC,cc_r xlc_r cc)
+ AC_CHECK_TOOLS(CC,cc_r xlc_r cc)
if test "$CC" = cc ; then
dnl no CC! don't allow --with-threads
@@ -696,7 +696,7 @@
fi
if test -z "${CC}"; then
- AC_CHECK_PROGS(CC,cc gcc,missing)
+ AC_CHECK_TOOLS(CC,cc gcc,missing)
if test "${CC}" = "missing" ; then
AC_MSG_ERROR([Unable to locate cc(1) or suitable replacement. Check PATH or set CC.])
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@
fi
if test -z "${AR}"; then
- AC_CHECK_PROGS(AR,ar gar,missing)
+ AC_CHECK_TOOLS(AR,ar gar,missing)
if test "${AR}" = "missing" ; then
AC_MSG_ERROR([Unable to locate ar(1) or suitable replacement. Check PATH or set AR.])
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@
fi
if test -z "${STRIP}"; then
- AC_CHECK_PROGS(STRIP,strip,missing)
+ AC_CHECK_TOOLS(STRIP,strip,missing)
if test "${STRIP}" = "missing" ; then
AC_MSG_ERROR([Unable to locate strip(1) or suitable replacement. Check PATH or set STRIP.])
