On 14/01/2025 08:24, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2025-01-13 11:13:24 -0500, Benjamin Barenblat wrote:
On Saturday, December 28, 2024, at 1:27 PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Were the test rebuilds for llvm-toolchain-* successful?
llvm-toolchain-17, -18, and -19 build successfully on amd64 with the new
Abseil packages installed
(sbuild --extra-package=.../libabsl20240722_20240722.0-1_amd64.deb
--extra-package=.../libabsl-dev_20240722.0-1_amd64.deb). -15 and -16 do
not build (-15 due to unresolvable dependencies and -16 due to an actual
build failure), but neither of these is in sid anymore, so it might be
okay.
Would you like me to do some builds on non-amd64 architectures as well?
Thanks for the tests! There is no need to also test it on non-amd64
architectures. We will start this transition once the current Python
3.11 as default transition is done.
That has happened, but I have noticed that the abseil autopkgtests are failing.
Can you take a look? Also this update seems to cause a regression in re2, that
needs to be investigated as well:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=abseil
Cheers,
Emilio
