Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: 1092...@bugs.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ocaml
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
I would like to request a transition slot for ocaml 5.3.0.
I've uploaded it to experimental, and it builds successfully on
all architectures so far:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ocaml&suite=experimental
The only missing release architecture is riscv64 at the moment (in
Needs-Build state).
I recompiled the OCaml world with it:
http://ocaml.debian.net/transitions/ocaml-5.3.0/
At most 424 source packages are involved. A binNMU will suffice for
most of them. I've posted a summary there:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092985#15
I think all problematic packages can be removed from testing. Bugs
have been filed:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ocaml-5.3.0-transition;users=debian-ocaml-ma...@lists.debian.org
I've also run tests on ci.debian.net infrastructure with the recompiled
packages, and no new regressions appear.
Ben file:
title = "ocaml";
is_affected = .depends ~ /ocaml(-base)?-5\.2\.0/ | .depends ~
/ocaml(-base)?-5\.3\.0/;
is_good = .depends ~ /ocaml(-base)?-5\.3\.0/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /ocaml(-base)?-5\.2\.0/;
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
