Control: severity -1 serious On Sun, Dec 08, 2024 at 09:15:17AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [наб] > > d/changelog says > > lsdvd (0.17-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * New upstream release, from new upstream and update copyright > > accordingly. > > but d/copyright still says > > It was downloaded from http://sourceforge.net/projects/acidrip/ > > whereas lsdvd 0.17 actually came from > > https://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/lsdvd > This seem to be based on a misunderstanding. The sf.php script is a > shim script making it easier to track new sourceforge.net releases in > d/watch files. The 'sf' in sf.php stands for sourceforge. We both understand this perfectly well, then.
> Why do you > believe these two locations do not represent the same source? Because one of them says lsdvd and has lsdvd 0.17 but the other one says acidrip and doesn't. Thus, the one that says acidrip can't possibly fulfil policy 12.5.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
