Jeremy Bícha <jeremy.bi...@canonical.com> writes: > Therefore, I used the format 0~20200916-1 for fonts-noto-color-emoji
Re-reading https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-version I wonder if we couldn't make an argument that "upstream_version" is empty, which actually better reflect that there is no upstream version number instead of incorrectly claiming that upstream_version is "0". I don't want to destroy consensus on 0~20200916-1, which is my preference, but maybe a version string like ~20200916-1 works for the no-upstream-version scenario. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
