On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 03:17:51PM -0300, Carlos Henrique Lima Melara wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 09:45:51AM GMT, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues > wrote: > > I am not using the schroot backend and when I did in the past, I used it > > exclusively with tarballs. You seem to be creating directory-based chroots > > for > > schroot. This is nothing that I am using in my daily sbuild usage, which > > probably explains why I'm not running into bugs like these. > > > > If you can supply a patch that does the right thing, that'd make me very > > happy. > > As I'm not using schroot anymore, my motivation to fix this is low but > > it'll be > > put on the TODO list. > > I'd love to provide a patch, but I don't speak perl :-( Maybe a simple > solution is to invoke sbuild-update instead of chrooting since it > already do the proper setup. Actually I was just Ctrl-C and running > sbuild-update afterwards.
So isn't this a bug in gpg then, which shouldn't manually close all possible FDs? (Instead use the close range function/syscall?) Chris
