在 2024/11/17 22:34, наб 写道:
[...]
>
>> As recently as bullseye, pth still had some significant
>> reverse-(build-)dependencies:
> This looked like a scary prospect,
>> $ grep-dctrl -FBuild-Depends -sPackage libpth-dev
>> /var/lib/apt/lists/deb.debian.org_debian_dists_bullseye_main_source_Sources
>> Package: gcc-9
>> Package: libdap
>> Package: pianobar
>> Package: unicon
>> Package: zhcon
>> $ grep-dctrl -FDepends -sPackage libpth20
>> /var/lib/apt/lists/deb.debian.org_debian_dists_bullseye_main_binary-amd64_Packages
>>
>> Package: libgm2-0
>> Package: genometools-common
>> Package: libpth-dev
>> Package: zhcon
zhcon is team maintained by Debian Chinese Team
<chinese-develop...@lists.alioth.debian.org>, I'm one of Uploaders.
zhcon not use libpth-dev from zhcon (1:0.2.6-19):
https://sources.debian.org/src/zhcon/1%3A0.2.6-20/debian/changelog/#L27
The team maintained package unicon also use libpth-dev before, the
maintainer of libpth NIIBE Yutaka <gni...@debian.org> had send the patch
for remove libpth-dev in package unicon.
https://salsa.debian.org/chinese-team/unicon/-/merge_requests/1/commits
> but from the changelogs and relevant bugs,
> it looks like all of these specced that by accident as a left-over.
>
> So it was deeply vestigial even in bullseye,
> and the maintainer trimmed it off most of the way.
>
>> but it does seem like it can be dropped now.
> https://bugs.debian.org/1087708
The maintainer of pth NIIBE Yutaka <gni...@debian.org> is active.
I'd meet him in Debconf24 Busan.
Why not let NIIBE do this RM report by himself?
Regards,
--
肖盛文 xiao sheng wen -- Debian Developer(atzlinux)
Debian QA page:
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=atzlinux%40debian.org
Debian salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/atzlinux-guest
GnuPG Public Key: 0x00186602339240CB
