Source: fotoxx
Version: 20.08-2
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: 1006...@bugs.debian.org, Santiago Torres Batan
<sant...@gmail.com>, Package Salvaging Team <team+salv...@tracker.debian.org>
Hi
I'm interested in salvaging your package fotoxx, in accordance with the
Package Salvaging procedure outlined in the Developers Reference[1].
Your package meets the criteria for this process, and I would love to
assist in preserving and maintaining it. As the Salvage process
suggests, here is a list of the criteria that apply, in my opinion:
- Bugs filed against the package do not have answers from the
maintainer.
- Upstream has released several versions, but despite there being
a bug entry asking for it, it has not been packaged.
(actually upstream has renamed the package to fotocx[2] meanwhile)
- There are QA issues with the package.
I believe your package would be a great addition to the Debian
Phototools Team - so I admit I would prefer moving it from debian/ team
space to debian-phototools-team. My goal is to make it as easy as
possible for you to join the team.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1]
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#package-salvaging
[2] https://kornelix.net/fotocx/fotocx.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), (50, 'unstable'), (5,
'experimental'), (1, 'buildd-experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.10.11-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=de_DE:de
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
