Source: swi-prolog Version: 9.0.4+dfsg-4 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package because it's indirectly blocking the perl transition. I noticed that it regularly fails, at least on ppc64el and riscv64, less so on other architectures (but all failures I saw were abol_test3).
Because the unstable-to-testing migration software now blocks on regressions in testing, flaky tests, i.e. tests that flip between passing and failing without changes to the list of installed packages, are causing people unrelated to your package to spend time on these tests. Don't hesitate to reach out if you need help and some more information from our infrastructure. Paul https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/swi-prolog/ https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/swi-prolog/testing/ppc64el/52722505/81s Running scripts from table_tests ...DIFFERS: 18 common, 1 extra, 1 missing
81s EXTRA: 81s < remaining(2) 81s MISSING: 81s > remaining(0)81s ERROR: /usr/lib/swi-prolog/test/Tests/xsb/table_tests/xsb_test_tables.pl:78:
81s test abol_test3: failed 81s 81s DIFFERS: 18 common, 1 extra, 1 missing 81s EXTRA: 81s < remaining(2) 81s MISSING: 81s > remaining(0)81s ERROR: /usr/lib/swi-prolog/test/Tests/xsb/table_tests/xsb_test_tables.pl:79:
81s test abol_test3a: failed 81s 82s ...........................82s Script /usr/lib/swi-prolog/test/Tests/xsb/table_tests/xsb_test_tables.pl failed
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
