This looks like a step in the right direction: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2006-May/104466.html
Although it has been noted in this thread that historically Debian has removed APSL2 packages, and that therefore BSD/MIT would be better. Also, it's one thing to get approval from the Squeak board, and quite another to actually do the work of putting together a relicensed distribution. So it seems all we can do now is wait and see. Now, the question is, in light of this recent development, should Squeak be removed from the "cannot be packaged" list, or would that be premature? Also, Lex, in light of the fact that you have packages already (albeit for the non-DFSG version) and Squeak seems to be moving towards a solution, is it time to change the RFP to an ITP? Regards, Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
