Hello,

On Thu 12 Sep 2024 at 12:42pm +02, Helmut Grohne wrote:

> Hi Sean,
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 11:28:13AM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> > I hope that this alleviates your concerns about the autoremoval method
>> > and lets us focus on the suggested removal.
>>
>> It does, thank you.
>
> Great!
>
>> I note that cycle-quotes has actually been orphaned for four years --
>> see #904238.  So I think you can decide to remove it on your own.
>>
>> (I think this suggests your script should look at wnpp bugs which
>> haven't seen uploads to update metadata, to save you some work.)
>
> I intentionally do not consider the orphaned status as a criterion.

Right, my point was that you can take the decision on your own.

> There are a number of well-maintained and yet orphaned packages. I am
> using the orphaned status myself to ease collaboration on some packages
> while still caring for them and the fact that you replied to this bug
> here indicates that you also somewhat care about cycle-quotes.

Hmm.  I think we understand the state differently.  I think it's
important that someone can totally give up responsibility for volunteer
work.  That's why I orphaned this package.  I don't want to take any
decisions about it.  But from my perspective you are free to.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to