On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:48:30AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 04:48:26PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 07:46:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 12:17:23PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I would also like to have kernel-image-sparc-2.2, and > > > > kernel-source-2.6.9 and its associated image and patch packages > > > > removed. 2.6.9 is dead and 2.6.10 has replaced it. If you have > > > > an architecture for which 2.6.10 is broken, now is your chance to > > > > speak up. Below is a list of packages that I nominate for removal. > > > > Ack, means that person spoke to me on IRC and agreed the package should > > > > be > > > > removed. > > > > > > Also, this would be the perfect time to NEW-process the powerpc 2.6.10 > > > kernel. > > > > Yes, I mentioned this to AJ as well. > > Yep, but not mentioned here.
But they are now because you have now mentioned them below. The reason I CCed a bunch of people on my post last week was to get them to add the relevant bits that are missing. > > Could you please log which kernels you have pending in new > > against this bug so he can see it when I prod him next? > > kernel-patch-powerpc-2.6.10, versions 2.6.10-1, 2.6.10-2, and 2.6.10-3. Presumably only 2.6.10-3 shold go into d.o, right? > The other issue will be my new kernel-patch-powerpc-2.4.27 upload, which will > obsolet the -apus kernels, and will thus need NEW processing, and the > kernel-image-latest packages which is now in NEW for almost two month, and i > got indirect info that i need to make a new upload of it or something. That sounds like an issue that needs some discussion, I take it that is what the recent discussions on debian-kernel/debian-boot about powerpc-2.4.27. Is this correct? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
