On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 05:02:43PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:01:49 -0400 Andrew Moise wrote: > > The image files don't include anything that > > resembles source, but I'm choosing to assume that DFSG #2 doesn't > > apply to images as long as they are being distributed legally and with > > permission. I'm not planning on complaining on that basis, IOW. > > What makes you think that distributing images in main without source is > *not* a violation of Debian SC?
I didn't say I didn't think it was a violation; it seems to me that a strict reading of the DFSG does require source for images (those image that have a meaningful "source" image). I said that I, personally, wasn't planning on making any kind of stink about images being distributed without source, as long as they're being distributed legally and in a way that the author is comfortable with. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
