On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 2:15 PM Alexis Murzeau <amub...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 20/06/2024 23:29, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > Hi Alexis,
> >
> > Thanks for taking time to create this package and your contribution to
> > Debian.
> >
> > I see you have submitted this Request For Sponsorship (RFS) but not toggled
> > 'Needs a sponsor' on the mentors site. I will offer a review that may
> > assist you
> > in your good work for the Debian project.
> >
> > Review...
> >
> > 1. Build: OK
> >
> > 2. Lintian: INFORMATION
> >
> > I: streamlink source: built-using-field-on-arch-all-package (in section for
> > python3-streamlink-doc) Built-Using ${sphinxdoc:Built-Using}
> > [debian/control:72]
> > N:
> > N: The stanza for an installation package in debian/control declares a
> > N: Built-Using field even though the package is declared as Architecture:
> > N: all. That is incorrect.
> > N:
> > N: The Built-Using field is only used architecture-specific packages.
> > Please
> > N: remove the Built-Using field from the indicated location.
> > N:
> > N: Visibility: info
> > N: Show-Always: no
> > N: Check: debian/control/field/built-using
> > N:
> >
> > Please could this be looked at for a future release/upload.
> >
> > 3. Licenses check: ISSUES
> >
> > philwyett@ks-windu:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/streamlink-6.8.1$
> > lrc
> > en: Versions: recon 1.10.1 check 3.3.9-1
> >
> > Parsing Source Tree ....
> > Reading copyright ....
> > Running licensecheck ....
> >
> > d/copyright | licensecheck
> >
> > Apache-2 | Apache-2.0 src/streamlink/packages/requests_file.py
> >
> > Minor and an easy fix.
> >
> > 4. Build Twice (sudo pbuilder build --twice <package>.dsc): OK
> >
> > 5. Install (No previous installs): OK
> >
> > 6. Upgrade (Over previous installs if any): OK
> >
> > Additional...
> >
> > A. 'debian/control'
> >
> > Please update to the latest 'Standards-Version' which is 4.7.0.
> >
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
> >
> > Summary...
> >
> > Please consider addressing the issues raised where applicable and remove the
> > 'moreinfo' tag when doing next/fixed upload.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Phil
> >
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> As this version is already uploaded, I've done the fixes for the next
> upstream version:
> - Fix the lintian issue about Built-Using (I kept it before as it was not
> clear to me whether sphinx-generated docs should use it or not).
> - Fix license short name: Apache-2 => Apache-2.0.
> - Bump standard version to 4.7.0 (no change required).
>
He chose to use the SPDX nomenclature. Very good!
https://spdx.org/licenses/Apache-2.0.html
For future inquiries
https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep5/
https://ftp-master.debian.org/licenses/
https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses
I use these links to study this.
--
Cheers,
Leandro Cunha
