On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 01:22:19PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > I'm not sure what I think about that. We have a general escape hatch > already for non-free packages in Policy 2.2.3 that says they may not fully > comply with Policy, which may be sufficient.
But precisely, we _do_ want non-free packages that are built on the autobuilders to comply with this requirement. So we do not want 2.2.3 to apply in that specific case. It seems cleaner to say that the requirement only apply if Autobuild: yes is declared. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.
