On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 05:14:17PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > After some thinking, I think I makes to (temporarily) allow both > libperl5.XXt64 and libperl5.XX, otherwise we'll have a mess during > the 5.40 transition. > (After that we can get rid of the option with the suffix again.)
Sure we need to allow for libperl5.XX to stay future-proof. I was just thinking of hardcoding libperl5.38t64 as the (temporary) other option rather than using a generic libperl5.XXt64 name. But no worries :) -- Niko
