The implicit declaration occurs on all arches, but it's a warning, not
an error. For example on amd64:
smbk5pwd.c:917:23: warning: implicit declaration of function
‘kadm5_s_init_with_password_ctx’; did you mean ‘kadm5_init_with_password_ctx’?
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
917 | ret = kadm5_s_init_with_password_ctx( context,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| kadm5_init_with_password_ctx
The binNMUs succeeded on several release arches already. I'm not sure
why hppa would be different. I see -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
in its compiler commands, but I don't know where it's coming from.
As for the implicit declaration, I don't remember why I didn't already
submit a patch for it... At a quick glance it looks like the prototype
is now in the private header <kadm5/kadm5-private.h>. I don't know if
there's a reason we can't/shouldn't include that one... The symbol may
be private, but we're already using it regardless :)
