Hi Charles,
I wonder how we can properly solve this bug. In the early stage of
Emboss packaging obviously the packages
libajax6,
libajax6-dev,
libnucleus6,
libnucleus6-dev
existed (thus the remaining Conflicts/Replaces on emboss-lib which can
probably be removed right now). I wonder whether we should restore those
single library package per shared library + devel package, merge
static+shared library in one package or even merge
libacd 6 emboss-lib (>= 6.6.0+dfsg)
libajax 6 emboss-lib (>= 6.6.0+dfsg)
libajaxdb 6 emboss-lib (>= 6.6.0+dfsg)
libajaxg 6 emboss-lib (>= 6.6.0+dfsg)
libensembl 6 emboss-lib (>= 6.6.0+dfsg)
libnucleus 6 emboss-lib (>= 6.6.0+dfsg)
in libemboss6
libepcre 7 emboss-lib (>= 6.6.0+dfsg)
in libemboss-pcre7 (ugly since its a code copy of pcre3 but well,
that's another battle field) and
libeplplot 3 emboss-lib (>= 6.6.0+dfsg)
in libemboss-plplot3 to express the proper sonames inside the library
package names. Any more sensible suggestion is pretty welcome.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
