Control: found -1 6.1.37-1 On Thursday, 2 November 2023 18:03:25 CET Jose M Calhariz wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 03:37:39PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > On Wednesday, 5 July 2023 19:07:15 CET Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > > Package: src:linux > > > Version: 6.1.27-1 > > > > Can you try with the latest version in the 6.1.x series to see if the > > problem is still there? > > As I need to setup ASAP the servers in production I do not know if I > have time in the next days. It works with backports kernels.
No problem. > The latest kernels I tested were: > Fail : Linux afs31 6.1.0-10-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.37-1 > (2023-07-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux Ok. Please test (when you have time) 6.1.55-1. Also verify if it's also present in 6.1~rc3-1~exp1 to make sure it's present in the whole 6.1 series. Use https://snapshot.debian.org/binary/linux-image-amd64/ to get it/them. If the bug is NOT present in either the latest or the first, then try other versions till you find the last one that work and the first one that fails. > OK : Linux afs31 6.4.0-0.deb12.2-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian > 6.4.4-3~bpo12+1 (2023-08-08) x86_64 GNU/Linux It was fixed in 6.3.7-1, so it was expected that a later versions also works. But let's ignore bpo as it likely won't provide useful data points. Unfortunately there isn't a 6.2 kernel uploaded to the Debian archive and thus not available on snapshot.d.o, but testing 6.3.1-1~exp1 should be useful. > The bug is present on Debian v11 too. So is an old bug with fixes on > kernel 6.2 rc something. I'd recommend to focus first on the 6.1 series for now. If at a later point testing with 5.10 may be useful, we can do that then.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
