package cvs tag 368909 + fixed pending thanks On 5/26/06, Zak B. Elep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems that they do have a point on ambiguity, so I think it would be better to patch this. Expect a fix very soon.
I've just committed the fix, thanks from an earlier work by the PLD team.[0] [0] http://cvs.pld.org.pl/SOURCES/cvs-POSIX.patch?rev=1.1 The other way to go around this would have been to use `_POSIX2_VERSION=199209` somewhere in rcs2log (Fedora CVS seems to do this,[1]) but I believe the patch from PLD would break things less. [1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-cvs-commits/2006-May/msg00390.html This should go into 1:1.12.13-3 soon. Thanks again! =) Cheers, Zakame -- Zak B. Elep || http://zakame.spunge.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1486 7957 454D E529 E4F1 F75E 5787 B1FD FA53 851D
