tags 1040906 + moreinfo pending thanks Hello JiaLing, Am Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 06:03:27PM +0800 schrieb zhangjialing: > I've created a patch for this bug, but I'm uncertain about how > hw->hw_cpuinfo should be handled. I've utilized the CPU Family and Model > Name. Hope this patch might provide some assistance in addressing this bug.
Thank you very much for the patch, this is great help!
I reviewed your patch and it looks fine. So I intend to integrate it
and prepare a new release.
However, I have two questions before I can prepare the release:
1. What is the license of your patch? Is GPL 3+ fine?
2. Usually, I use "vendor" for hw->hw_cpuinfo, however, it looks like
to me there is only one vendor?
In this case I think using "familiy" is fine. In the end, it is up
to you porters to that architecture.
As I don't have access to this port, please check linuxinfo after
release.
I have another bug on my plate, but I would like to release sometime
in October.
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [email protected]
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
