On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 02:38:14PM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > On 2023-09-11 11:25:34, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Antoine Beaupré <anar...@debian.org> writes: > > > >> I get the argument against bad binaries not being in PATH but we have > >> some tooling for that, don't we? /usr/libexec, no? > > > > /usr/libexec isn't a replacement because it's not on any user's PATH. > > /usr/games is intended to be added to a regular user's path but not > > root's, which is a distinct use case. > > That's an odd argument to make: /usr/games isn't on any user's PATH > either, is it?
% grep games /etc/profile /etc/login.defs /etc/profile: PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games" /etc/login.defs:ENV_PATH PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.
