Adam Borowski wrote: > Alas, noto has the downside of making font pickers next to useless, as > it declares every single of languages it supports as a separate font > family. > So instead off just "Noto Sans" "Noto Mono" "Noto Slightly Serifed", you > have "Noto Western Klingon" "Noto Eastern Klingon" and so on, making the > list of available fonts one big noto fest. >
Ah, okay. I don't tend to encounter font pickers, so I hadn't noticed. > Given that you can install Noto yourself if that is your choice, removing > any need for this metapackage, I don't quite see the point of declaring > an alternative. The point would just be that I keep track of the packages I've installed manually, and the fewer there are the easier that is. Still, I've always got the option of reducing that list to a single personal metapackage via equivs. -- JBR with apologies for the formatting - I'm away from my usual keyboard
