Le Lun 22 Mai 2006 22:03, Kyle Wheeler a écrit : > On Monday, May 22 at 04:00 PM, quoth James Vega: > >On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 02:46:40PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > >> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 02:17:12PM -0400, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > >> > While the muttrc.vim that comes with Vim 7 does support some > >> > extra configuration options from common patches, it does not > >> > (and cannot) support every patch to mutt ever written. Also, it > >> > supports mutt syntax up through mutt version 1.5.11 (which is > >> > still the current development release). As the maintainer of > >> > muttrc.vim, I try to keep its syntax support up-to-date and I > >> > try to include options from very popular patches, but I have to > >> > draw the line somewhere. > >> > >> Thanks for the comments. I hadn't considered that these options > >> were introduced by random patches (apparently applied by Debian). > >> I'll close this bug now, unless you want it opened to keep track > >> of the extra options (but it doesn't seem like you need it). > > > >Since the version of mutt in Debian recognizes these other > > configuration options, it may be worthwhile for us > > (pkg-vim-maintainers) to keep a patch against the muttrc.vim for > > these options. > > If it helps, an updated version of this syntax file, that supports > these options, is available here: > http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1479
it's just an idea, but why don't you create a switch that allow the user to understand an "extended" muttrc syntax like a g:use_muttrc_extensions that defaults to 0, but that a user could set to 1 ? so that we can (debian packagers) set to 1 by default if we feel so ? it's just a tiny suggestion, we can obviously maintain a patch or use the URL you provided ! thanks ! -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpPMuXJP1KcH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
