Hi.
Kurt Hornik writes ("Debian PR #1042889"):
> Have you seen
> <https://bugs.launchpad.net/vm/+bug/1979048>
> ?
No.
> This points to a branch of VM at
> <https://code.launchpad.net/~markd-kermodei/vm/vm-emacs-28>
> which apparently at some point in time passed native compilation (I
> never got a chance to try to far).
Interesting!
> I can try to follow up with Uday Reddy and Mark Diekhans to try merging
> the native compilation fixes into the main branch (at least).
That would be great.
> Afaict, part of the problem was Emacs 29 not being out when this was
> reported, and Emacs 28 having native compilation off by default but on
> for the Debian packages. In any case, Emacs 29 is out now, so I guess
> time to ask again.
Thanks for the info.
With my Debian maintainer hat on, I don't think I ought to be fishing
some random branch out of launchpad and shipping it to Debian's users,
without a fairly thorough review. (Also, it's in bzr!)
So I think I need to fix #1042889 by disabling byte-compilation,
pending a better resolution (ideally, upstream).
PS: Was there a reason you didn't send your message to the Debian
ticket #1042889 ? I think it's generally a good idea to do these
things in public. Unless you tell me not to, I will forward your
message (and this one) to the bug - so please let me know if you
object for any reason.
Regards,
Ian.
--
Ian Jackson <[email protected]> These opinions are my own.
Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk,
that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
