On 03 May 2023 09:02:43 +0900 Marc Dequènes (duck) <d...@duckcorp.org> wrote: > On 2023-05-01 07:11, Marie Janssen wrote: > > > The greetd package suggests: wlgreet but it is not available, causing > > the confusing situation where it's recommended (and seems likely to be > > preferred, given the lightdm situation that caused greetd to be added) > > but not available. > > > > I'd recommend removing it from Suggests: until #1010248 is resolved. > > Indeed it's confusing. wlgreet packaging is taking more time than > expected but should not be too far from completion.
Now that #1010248 is resolved and wlgreet is available, is there still a reason left to keep this bug open?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.