On miércoles, 12 de julio de 2023 19:15:20 -03 Lisandro Damian Nicanor Perez Meyer wrote: > On miércoles, 21 de junio de 2023 05:51:37 -03 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > huh? > > > > if the declaration of the private dependency is just missing in that qtc > > plugin , then fair enough. > > You need the QML private headers for that part since ages. > > > but that doesn't explain the total garbage > > error message which suggests some kind of internal error (it sort of > > suggests that an incomplete package is installed like in the other bug i > > reported, except that it's just not there). > > Exactly, it suggests you are missing the private headers. Whoever coded that > made them a dependency. The fact that we split them and do not install them > by default makes the code show that error message.
Or maybe you where suggesting that the error message is not as helpful as a more direct one. If that's the case... I don't think any of us will put time on that. If you want I can reopen the bug and mark it as wishlist. But you know the upstream procedure better than I, and maybe you can sen a patch to upstream!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
