Julien Goodwin @ 2006-05-02 (Tuesday), 13:27 (+1000) > v1.0 has been released on April 27th, can we please have an updated > package. I'm having to ssh in to a sarge box to run gq.
I downloaded upstream source tar ball gq-1.0.0.tar.gz and the latest debian patch file gq_1.0beta1-4.diff.gz, built my own package and can verify that it worked without any major problems. This is what I did: 22:11|leka% patch -p1 < ../gq_1.0beta1-4.diff patching file config.guess patching file config.sub patching file debian/changelog patching file debian/compat patching file debian/menu patching file debian/gq.1 patching file debian/dirs patching file debian/docs patching file debian/README.Debian patching file debian/patches/01_maintainhiddenstatus.dpatch patching file debian/patches/00list patching file debian/patches/02_deletepassonask.dpatch patching file debian/patches/03_gcc4.dpatch patching file debian/patches/03_gcc4.dpatch.OLD patching file debian/rules patching file debian/watch patching file debian/copyright patching file debian/control patching file NEWS Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file NEWS.rej 22:11|leka% chmod +x debian/rules 22:11|leka% debchange --newversion '1.0.0-0cos' "New upstream" 22:11|leka% egrep -v '^01_|^03_' debian/patches/00list.old > debian/patches/00list 22:11|leka% dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot The patch failed to apply for the NEWS file, no biggie. I guess it's even kinda good, since the statement in it does not seem to be true anymore. What needs to be investigated is what happened to the changes made in 01_maintainhiddenstatus and 03_gcc4. Are they incorporated in the new upstream source tree? -- /Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
