Hi, On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 09:39:14AM +0200, Yoann Congal wrote: > On 4/19/23 08:47, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi Yoann, > > Hi! > > > > > Thanks for providing the merge request. Just for cross-reference and > > transparency: This change cannot go anymore for bookworm, but we can > > pick it up for trixie. > > Yeah, I understood that it won't go into bookworm as I was a bit > late for that, but that's OK. > AFAIK it will end up in backports so we could have bookworm + > backported kernel with this module activated, or am I wrong?
No that is correct assumption. Once bookworm-backports opens (and someone in the team picks it), the version from the upper suite can go into bookworm-backports, and that will have the same configuration basis, so include the activated module as well. So in short, correct. Regards, Salvatore
