On Wed, 2023-04-12 at 22:47 +0200, Gert van de Kraats wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Thanks for soon reply. > > What do you mean by upstream. I only know a ticket at filezilla, but > this is closed. > > I think this is a regression bug at gcc 12, but I could not find a > bugreport upstream or at Debian for gcc. > > Greetings, > > Gert
Hi Gert, Sorry, when I mean upstream I do mean filezilla and communications with the project indicates no real interest in the 32-bit x86 build these days with the fact that 64-bit x86 has now been out for a couple of decades. I did allocate this bug to gcc under Debian and they threw it back as a filezilla bug. I will give some time to this again in a few days (when I am free) and we can see what we can do. Regards Phil -- *** Playing the game for the games own sake. *** Associations: * Debian Maintainer (DM) * Fedora/EPEL Maintainer. * Contributor member of the AlmaLinux foundation. WWW: https://kathenas.org Buy Me a Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Twitter: @kathenasorg Instagram: @kathenasorg IRC: kathenas GPG: 724AA9B52F024C8B
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part