Its actually not my game, but if it speeds things up, I will help testing (if anyone tells me, what to do).
On Sat, 2023-03-04 at 10:11 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Marc-Robin, > > On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 09:36:35AM +0100, Marc-Robin Wendt wrote: > > Ok folks. That's it now. I have a server farm with Debian+Xen and > > I'm > > stuck in a dead end, because this Bug gets not fixed. I delayed > > kernel > > updates since 5 month now, but can't delay anymore, because of CVE- > > 2022-42328, CVE-2022-42329 and CVE-2022-3643. > > > > So I have to change to Redhat now? Means my servers will be lost > > for > > Debian for a pretty while. It's a pity, because like this, Debian > > Project goes down the drain. Maybe the maintainers should think > > about > > priorities. Bugs like this usually don't affect end consumer > > devices, > > but the big server farm provider, who btw. donate a pretty much of > > ressources to the Debian Project. > > People involved appear to prefer to rant on this bug instead of > providing help and taking note of what was mentioned in > https://bugs.debian.org/1022126#117 and earlier replies and the fact > that the discussion was brought up to upstream by the Debian > maintainers an happens on the upstream regression list: > > https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/754b030c-ba14-167c-e2d0-2f4f5bf55...@leemhuis.info/ > > I take your mail such that you are willing to test accordingly > patches > which would be followed by the above thread? Including adding > Tested-by on needed-to-backport patches? > > Regards, > Salvatore >