* Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-15 16:26]: > No reason; that was to force 3.4 when the default was 3.3. With each > new babel release, I find I need to make the build process depend on a > specific gcc version; it's arduous enough that I've procrastinated > building a new package for over a year. > > I'll take care of it "real soon now", but in any case, before the NMU > period begins in your proposed gcc 4.1 schedule.
OK, thanks. Just for the record though, this bug is not really related to the 4.1 transition. It would be nice if this package could move to 4.x though. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
