Source: pysdl2 Version: 0.9.15+dfsg-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: [email protected] Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Hi, Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed that pysdl2 in experimental could not be built reproducibly. This is because the documentation embeds a timestamp. Patch attached that seeds this date from SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH [1] if available. [0] https://reproducible-builds.org/ [1] https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` [email protected] / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
--- a/debian/patches/0003-reproducible-build.patch 1969-12-31 16:00:00.000000000 -0800 --- b/debian/patches/0003-reproducible-build.patch 2023-02-16 12:38:14.656545296 -0800 @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +Description: Make the build reproducible +Author: Chris Lamb <[email protected]> +Last-Update: 2023-02-16 + +--- pysdl2-0.9.15+dfsg.orig/doc/conf.py ++++ pysdl2-0.9.15+dfsg/doc/conf.py +@@ -2,8 +2,9 @@ + + import os + import sys ++import time ++import datetime + import pkg_resources +-from datetime import date + + # -- Path setup -------------------------------------------------------------- + +@@ -17,7 +18,9 @@ sys.path.append(os.path.join(parent_dir, + + # -- Project information ----------------------------------------------------- + +-curr_date = date.today() ++curr_date = datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp( ++ int(os.environ.get('SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH', time.time())) ++).date() + copyright_str = '{0}, Marcus von Appen. Last updated: {1}' + + project = 'PySDL2' --- a/debian/patches/series 2023-02-16 12:33:49.951412423 -0800 --- b/debian/patches/series 2023-02-16 12:38:13.312477668 -0800 @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ 0002-dont-include-buildpath-in-docs.patch tests-Don-t-assume-SDL_Init-will-leave-SDL_GetError-unset.patch tests-Skip-pixel-comparison-when-loading-XCF-files-on-big.patch +0003-reproducible-build.patch
