Am Montag, 15. Mai 2006 15:30 schrieb Marc Haber: > tags #366491 pending > thanks > > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:13:23PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > I'm probably going to move the macro definition to the actual ACL file > > as this is possible with current exim versions, but I'll need to > > clarify spec.txt chapter 6.4 on exim-users before I actually do this. > > See > > http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20060508/msg0012 > >0.html > > Since the desired form of macro definition and actual ACL wis not > possible with current exim, I have changed and rephrased the > documentation in a more verbose way. Let me know if that's acceptable > to you.
Thank you very much, that makes your point for the default configuration very clear and helps a lot in changing it to a less secure but more RFC2822 setup. You are right: safety first, most exim4 users will never notice that some valid localparts will be rejected. klaus -- Klaus Muth HAGOS eG Industriestr. 62 fon: (+49) 711 78805-86 EDV-Programmierung 70565 Stuttgart fax: (+49) 711 78805-35 http://www.hagos.de Germany mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
