On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 04:12:35PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> > Is there a way to avoid using this file ?
> >>
> >> That depends on why it is used. If it only uses the file, but does not
> >> use latex2html itself, it can probably be replaced. Where can I have a
> >> look at the new beta release?
> >
> > Well I put the updated package at
> > <http://people.debian.org/~ballombe/pnmu/>
>
> It's easy - the file is completely unneeded. At least it is processed
> fine without, and I found no usage of any of the commands defined in
> html.sty. Since I don't understand the text, I didn't look at the
> layout or so.
What about
\usepackage{html}
\htmladdnormallink
?
How should we proceed to build the package witout html.sty ?
> However, there's an other problem: The header of the problematic file,
> tabela-simbolos-doc.tex, says:
>
> %% This file is distributed under the Free Document License (FDL)
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html
> Unless there is a different license statement somewhere in the LEIAME
> files or so, I'd be careful to check what this means. There's no
> indication of problematic invariant sections (front-cover texts,
> history, etc.). But I fear this just means that the author didn't apply
> the GFDL properly, and it is unclear whether or not any secondary
> sections in the document are invariant. It would really be better if
> upstream read the section "ADDENDUM: How to use this License for your
> documents" in the GFDL and acted accordingly.
I hope this is a remnant of the past and that the license was meant to
be the LPPL.
Care to report a bug ?
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
