Hi, On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 06:20:54PM +0100, Computer Enthusiastic wrote: > Hello Salvatore, > > On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 19:39:23 +0200 Computer Enthusiastic > <computer.enthusias...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Salvatore, > > > > Il giorno mar 20 set 2022 alle ore 12:32 Salvatore Bonaccorso > > <car...@debian.org> ha scritto: > > > > > > Hi, > > [..] > > > > > > > > What could be done to make the patch land in the current Debian Stable > > > > (Bullseye) kernel release ? > > > > > > It should land in the 5.10.y stable series which we will then pick up > > > automatically on next rebases. But what is puzzling is that the commit > > > has been marked for stable only v5.15+. If you were able to confirm it > > > is actually present in 5.10.y as well then it needs a followup to be > > > picked as well for the 5.10.y stable series. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Salvatore > > > > Yes, the patch is marked as only v5.15+, but the issue is still there > > in kernel 5.10, too. > > > > As you suggested, I have tested the vanilla kernel 5.10.145 with and > > without kernel patches, as reported here [0]. > > > > Thanks. > > > > [0] > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2022-September/041182.html > > Thank you for supporting me to explain upstream the request for backporting > the patch to 5.10.y. > > The patch has been backported to Linux 5.10.166 few days ago [1]. > > I suppose it will hopefully be available in the Linux kernel shipped with > the next Debian point release.
Yes I'm aware. It will be in the update which rebases to at least to 5.10.166 and is currently pending at https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/644 . Regards, Salvatore
