Hi, did anyone ever test whether the tests that failed before succeeded with the patch applied?
I have a reason to believe that the patch may be needed but the comment on top is incorrect: In https://lists.zytor.com/archives/klibc/2023-January/004705.html a problem with klibc on mips64el was pointed out leading to https://lists.zytor.com/archives/klibc/2023-January/004706.html which patched the arch-specific “struct stat”. If my_fstatat64_func uses its own concept of struct stat, this may need adjusting, too. bye, //mirabilos -- [...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but what about xfs, and if only i had waited until reiser4 was ready... in the be- ginning, there was ffs, and in the middle, there was ffs, and at the end, there was still ffs, and the sys admins knew it was good. :) -- Ted Unangst über *fs
