Hi Petter, On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 10:52:23AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > I mean to talk to the reverse dependency maintainers.
Since qflow and arachne-pnr are science-team maintained and Steffen was kind enough to grant me DM rights for them I've uploaded fixes for both to unstable. > Once the path forward is agreed with the reverse dependency maintainers, > one of the options might be for them to drop mips64el from their > packages too (and request the removal of their mips64el packages from > the archive). For qflow I've opted for deliberatly making the build fail on unsupported architectures as we do for yosys now. As for arachne-pnr I've simply switched an (uneccesarry) Depends: yosys to be a Suggests: yosys instead. I hope that unblocks this RM request. Do I need to file a seperate RM request for qflow or can this be handled as part of this request? In case of the former qflow should be removed on mipsel64el as well. Thanks, --Daniel
