[…]
> Then it is not only a non-source file but a non-source file that does not 
> have a public source.

Right, since this file does not have a public source, this is a valid reason to 
remove it.

So here’s the proof how useful the discussion was we’ve just had on this topic.
The usefulness is visible in that now there’s a valid reason to delete this 
file.

I’ve just prepared a new Debian tarball for Bibledit Cloud and uploaded the new 
build to the Debian archives.

It also includes also your recent fixes in Salsa - thank you for that 
contribution.

Then the upload to Bibledit (non-Cloud) should finally fix this bug - coming 
soon.

Reply via email to