Le Jeu 11 Mai 2006 13:12, Frank Küster a écrit : > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > severity important, because it's near debconf abuse (which is > > IIRC RC). > > I think RC is too much, but I agree with important. Anyway, do you > think that it's necessary to care for people who upgrade only rarely, > and upload 0.23 with > > db_fget tex-common/groupname seen > if [ "$RET" = true ]; then > db_fset tex-common/groupname_single seen > db_fset tex-common/groupname_multi seen > fi > > or do you think that we can just ignore this? Hm, maybe rather not, > since testing users already have answered it once, and would be asked > again if 0.22 enters etch. hmm, I don't know, it's your call. I don't know exactly what groupname_single/_multi split is for, so if for 99% of the uses, those two values are the same as groupname, then yes, I think you should do that. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpAqVcM5wq7y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
