Hi, On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 02:06:55PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Like I said the last time this was asked about: > > I am fine either way, but whatever package takes up these firmware > files must be prepared to make releases *to stable and backports* > relatively often, and deal with regressions.
> > And it is easier to deal with regression issues on firmware when > they're split to their own packages, really. > > Since SEV firmware is "loaded late" (unlike cpu microcode), it will > work just fine wherever it is packaged. So, it really is just an > issue of how annoying it will be to deal with updates and reverting > it should it cause regressions. I personally feel it makes sense to > group it with the processor firmware, though. > > Meanwhile, if there is an important SEV update pending, please file > a bug requesting an update on amd64-microcode. Okay from my view at least, let's keep them provided by src:amd64-microcode accordingly! Regards, Salvatore
