Hi Rene, On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 09:25:26 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Nope. Don't use nvidia is the solution here, as simple as that. "Augen > auf beim Hardwarekauf" is a idiom here in Germany, rougly translated > "Open your eyes when buying hardware"
Exactly this „Augen auf beim Hardwarekauf” was what I did when I once bought this expensive hires and large screen durable, long-living notebook. It was delivered even with a preinstalled Linux on it instead of windows, and if you look back nvidia was recommended for linux, exactly because of other manufacturers didn't care much for linux drivers in those days. So there's no point in saying "Augen auf". Nowadays I couldn't effort to buy an equivalent replacement, so also there is no point in saying “dump it, while it's still working absolutely fine and fast and does it's job on everyday usage”, as you did before. On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 09:25:26 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: >For exactly the reasons you reiterate below people should not use or buy >nvidia stuff. You could be sure, the way they have treated me by trying to brick this perfectly working notebook I will never ever again buy nvidia, and wouldn't ever recommend it to other people. On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 09:25:26 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > use nouveau. Or use nouveau from the start. You should read more carefully, please. I had clearly stated: > [...] proprietary nvidia driver. With the latter all GUI > menus open immediately, without any delay, while with > nouveau driver you'll have to wait sometimes more than > 8 seconds for a response after click. Let me know if you have an idea how to use this obviously broken nouveau driver for everyday work. The noveau driver is what actually makes this notebook slow and nonfunctional. I really would like to follow your advice to get rid of the nvidia proprietary stuff. Btw, there is no point in saying “use it from the start”, since there simply was no nouveau driver. On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 09:25:26 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > For the record: This is not bullseye. It is bullseye without updates > (and especially security updates) (bullseye contains deb11u3, security > deb11u4) Again, you should read way more carefully, really. I had clearly stated: > This was a test using the preinstalled version as present > in the Live USB device. I'll apply an apt-upgrade to this > USB stick tomorrow and recheck. The installation-candidate > for Libreoffice is: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4, which will be the > next one I'm going to check out. [...] > Will check back with additional results once updated both > the system and Libreoffice as said above. So, as promised, I'm back with a report from completely recent apt-upgraded bullseye system (still without any backports). Sadly, same issue with Libreoffice as described originally is present. Technical data: Libreoffice Version as reported by GUI: Version: 7.0.4.2 Build ID: 00(Build:2) CPU threads: 1; OS: Linux 4.9; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: de-DE (de_DE.UTF-8); UI: de-DE Debian package version: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 Calc: threaded $ apt-cache policy libreoffice* | grep -v '(keine)' | grep -B1 Installiert libreoffice-calc: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 libreoffice-base-core: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 libreoffice-core: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 libreoffice-common: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 libreoffice-draw: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 libreoffice-impress: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 libreoffice-l10n-de: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 libreoffice-style-colibre: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 libreoffice-writer: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 libreoffice-help-de: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 libreoffice-help-common: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 libreoffice-math: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 libreoffice-gtk3: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 ucf: Installiert: 3.0043 libabw-0.1-1: Installiert: 0.1.3-1 libc6: Installiert: 2.31-13+deb11u5 libe-book-0.1-1: Installiert: 0.1.3-2 libepubgen-0.1-1: Installiert: 0.1.1-1 libetonyek-0.1-1: Installiert: 0.1.9-4 libgcc-s1: Installiert: 10.2.1-6 libicu67: Installiert: 67.1-7 libmwaw-0.3-3: Installiert: 0.3.17-1 libodfgen-0.1-1: Installiert: 0.1.8-2 librevenge-0.0-0: Installiert: 0.0.4-6+b1 libstaroffice-0.0-0: Installiert: 0.0.7-1 libstdc++6: Installiert: 10.2.1-6 libuno-cppu3: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 libuno-cppuhelpergcc3-3: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 libuno-sal3: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 libuno-salhelpergcc3-3: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 libwpd-0.10-10: Installiert: 0.10.3-1 libwpg-0.3-3: Installiert: 0.3.3-1 libwps-0.4-4: Installiert: 0.4.12-1 libxml2: Installiert: 2.9.10+dfsg-6.7+deb11u2 uno-libs-private: Installiert: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4 zlib1g: Installiert: 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2+deb11u2 $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Debian Description: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) Release: 11 Codename: bullseye uname -r 4.9.0-326-antix.1-686-smp-pae $ lscpu (same as above) $ free gesamt benutzt frei gemns. Puffer/Cache verfügbar Speicher: 2061432 231744 435144 997588 1394544 765336 Swap: 2097148 1780 2095368 Now I'll install the bullseye backported Libreoffice version from bookworm as you've asked for also, and check back with an updated report once it was done. Regards Robin