Hi Samuel, On 21-09-2022 20:50, Samuel Henrique wrote:
Thanks for the ping, I did see Thorsten's replies but I'm still considering what to do, since removing aircrack-ng from s390x is gonna take much more effort than what I was willing to spend on the issue[0], at this stage it might be better to let it stay in s390x with some of the features working, but I would have to address the test failures still.Please let me know if there is anything besides aircrack-ng blocked by this, as it increases the priority of fixing this.
Well, I pinged you because I noticed the bug wasn't forwarded to you. I looked because aircrack-ng showed up in my out-of-sync script, that I use to file RC bugs for packages being out-of-sync between unstable and testing. The reason why I didn't file the bug is because you already took action to file the RM bug. An RC bug will cause autoremoval in due time.
[0] Since most of the reverse deps will also have to be removed, I think the only one which stays is forensics-all.
For architecture specific problems we have porters. Have you considered contacting them?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
