Source: ruby-httparty Version: 0.20.0-1 Severity: important Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.1
Hi, We are about to start the ruby3.1 transition in unstable. While trying to rebuild ruby-httparty with ruby3.1 enabled, the build failed. Relevant part of the build log (hopefully): > RuntimeError: > coverage measurement is already setup > # > /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/simplecov-0.21.2/lib/simplecov.rb:354:in > `start' > # > /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/simplecov-0.21.2/lib/simplecov.rb:354:in > `start_coverage_with_criteria' > # > /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/simplecov-0.21.2/lib/simplecov.rb:343:in > `start_coverage_measurement' > # > /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/simplecov-0.21.2/lib/simplecov.rb:59:in > `start' > # ./spec/spec_helper.rb:2:in `<top (required)>' > # ./spec/httparty_spec.rb:1:in `require_relative' > # ./spec/httparty_spec.rb:1:in `<top (required)>' > No examples found. > > Finished in 0.00004 seconds (files took 0.14035 seconds to load) > 0 examples, 0 failures, 18 errors occurred outside of examples > > Coverage report generated for RSpec to /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/coverage. 0 / 0 LOC > (100.0%) covered. > Stopped processing SimpleCov as a previous error not related to SimpleCov has > been detected > /usr/bin/ruby3.1 > -I/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-support-3.10.3/lib:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.10.1/lib > /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.10.1/exe/rspec > --pattern ./spec/\*\*/\*_spec.rb --format documentation failed > ERROR: Test "ruby3.1" failed: The full build log is available from: https://people.debian.org/~terceiro/ruby3.1/17/ruby-httparty/ruby-httparty_0.20.0-1+rebuild1663007717_amd64-2022-09-12T18:35:18Z.build To reproduce this, you need to install ruby-all-dev >= 1:3.0+2. Depending on when you try this, it might mean installing ruby-all-dev from experimental, or if the transition has already started, a normal build on unstable will be enough. If you fail to reproduce, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime. A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
