Am Samstag, den 06.05.2006, 16:52 +0200 schrieb Ralf Wildenhues:
> * Daniel Leidert wrote on Sat, May 06, 2006 at 03:26:06PM CEST:
> > Package: automake1.9
> > Version: 1.9.6-4
>
> > I may be wrong, but only using man_MANS has no effect on the resulting
> > Makefile. The related targets are not created. When I instead use
> >
> > manx_MANS (x=0-9)
> >
> > the resulting Makefile.in contains all targets to read and install
> > manpage (e.g. install-manx, uninstall-manx, MANS, ...) determined by
> > manx_MANS and(!) man_MANS. So for me it seems, there must be a bug.
>
> Could you supply a small example that exposes the bug you see, and
> stating what behavior you expect?
As a small example for what I tried:
man_src = \
foo.1.xml \
bar.1.xml \
lib.3.cml
man_MANS = $(patsubst %.xml,%,$(man_src))
[..]
And I thought, that man_MANS therefor is foo.1 bar.1 lib.3. But nothing
happens and the Makefile does not show MANS nor install/uninstall
targets. But adding a target
all-local: $(man_MANS)
shows, that man_MANS has the right content.
> You know that when using man_MANS
> (as opposed to numbered man<N>_MANS) the man pages have to have a
> correctly numbered extension, as documented in the manual?
Yes. But maybe, what I try is just impossible. Is it? If yes or if I
missed an important information, please excuse this entry.
Regards, Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
