Am Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 12:29:50AM -0400 schrieb Andres Salomon:
> Yeah, I was just noticing that. I'll wait a few more months to see if
> youtube-dl does an actual release, but long-term it might make sense to turn
> youtube-dl into an empty package that depends on yt-dlp.
>
> Since they have different command-line arguments and people might be using
> youtube-dl in scripts, I do wonder if youtube-dl should remain in bookworm
> with a NEWS.Debian warning users to switch to yt-dlp, and have it become a
> dummy package in bookworm+1?
Whatever you people who are *way, way* better informed about youtube-dl than
I am / will be decide: I would be really happyif you would consider team
maintaining youtube-dl and yt-dl since I'm really not the best person to
maintain this package. I'm fine with sponsoring any of your work if you do
not have upload permissions.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
