On 2022-06-28 Bastian Germann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Andreas,
> Am 28.06.22 um 18:36 schrieb Andreas Metzler: > > Afaiui the aggregated work is GPL-3, this being the strictest license > > and all code is either (C) FSF or public domain. > Even if you use the LGPL's "relicensing to GPL" option ISC and > BSD-4-clause-UC are still missing. The are compatible with and not as > strict as GPL-3+ but still need to be documented not only to comply > with Debian Policy but also for the binary package to be distributable > without the source package (to fulfill their requirements of copying > the copyright notice and license). Hello, I disagree that this is as clear cut as you make it sound, policy does not require DEP-5 or similar per file level listings. The aggregated work is licensed GPL-3+, there is no legal or policy need to list the license of the individual files in the binary package. And we are listing the copyright holder (FSF). cu Andreas
