On Mon, 2022-05-30 at 17:31 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 29/05/2022 16.16, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Unfortunately the amd64 upload got rejected: > > > > Version check failed: > > Your upload included the binary package nvidia-openjdk-8-jre, > > version > > 9.+8u332-ga-1~deb9u1~11.2.2-3+deb11u2, for amd64, > > however experimental already has version 9.+8u332-ga-1~11.5.1-2. > > Uploads to proposed-updates must have a lower version than present > > in > > experimental. > > Oh yes. 1~d < 1 > 1~d~1 > 1~1 > > Is there a similar constraint for sid as well? I would have expected > that to trigger first ... and probably s/already/only/ ... >
Surprisingly not. I have a feeling there once was, but it was removed. I'm not entirely sure on that though; memory can play tricks. The current checks are: adsb@coccia:$ dak admin v-c list-suite proposed-updates proposed-updates MustBeNewerThan oldoldoldstable proposed-updates MustBeNewerThan oldoldstable proposed-updates MustBeNewerThan stable proposed-updates Enhances stable proposed-updates MustBeNewerThan oldstable proposed-updates MustBeOlderThan experimental > Before I upload a fix, I'd like you to double check that these > versions do not validate the ordering rules: > > nvidia-openjdk-8-jre_9.+8u332-ga-1~~deb9u1~11.2.2-3+deb11u3_amd64.deb > nvidia-openjdk-8-jre_9.+8u312-b07-1~11.2.2+8u302-b08-1~11.2.2- > 3+deb11u3_ppc64el.deb > nvidia-openjdk-8-jre | 9.+8u332-ga-1~11.4.3-3 | testing/non-free | amd64, ppc64el nvidia-openjdk-8-jre | 9.+8u332-ga-1~11.4.3-3 | unstable/non-free | amd64, ppc64el nvidia-openjdk-8-jre | 9.+8u332-ga-1~11.5.1-2 | experimental/non-free | amd64, ppc64el $ dpkg --compare-versions "9.+8u332-ga-1~~deb9u1~11.2.2-3+deb11u3" lt "9.+8u332-ga-1~11.4.3-3" && echo y y $ dpkg --compare-versions "9.+8u312-b07-1~11.2.2+8u302-b08-1~11.2.2-3+deb11u3" lt "9.+8u332-ga-1~11.4.3-3" && echo y y Both look OK so far as I can see, and already sort below the version in testing so don't present any issues with prop-ups etc. Regards, Adam
